Working with separate vendors
Editorial, design and print each hold a different brief. Handovers lose context. No single party owns the schedule, and when the French edition slips, nobody is accountable for it.

Three things separate a publishing partner from a print vendor. Here is where we stand on each.

Our team is in Tsinga, Yaoundé. That means site visits, in-person reviews and a schedule that runs on local realities rather than a distant head office calendar.
It also means working knowledge of the Cameroonian education context and the needs of local learners and educators.

Quality Review is step four of five, and it has the authority to stop a project going to print. Proofreading, factual checks and curriculum alignment are verified against the original brief.
Backed by six decades of group publishing standards — inherited process, not improvised.

In a bilingual country, a French edition that reads like a translation is a liability. Our translators work in the education context daily and localise rather than transpose — examples, names, currency, idiom and classroom register all adjusted.
Both language tracks are planned and scheduled together from day one, so neither edition becomes the afterthought that ships late.
Editorial, design and print each hold a different brief. Handovers lose context. No single party owns the schedule, and when the French edition slips, nobody is accountable for it.
One brief, one project lead, one schedule covering both languages, and a quality gate that has to be passed before print. If something slips, you have one number to call.
Send us the scope. We will come back with a plan, a schedule and a price.